operations Intermediate Executive Director Operations Coordinator ✓ Tested 8.82/10

Performance Review Template

Structured annual employee evaluation form

The Prompt

The Prompt

Create a fillable, nonprofit-specific Performance Review Template for [ORGANIZATION NAME], used by [EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/OPERATIONS COORDINATOR] for [REVIEW PERIOD] reviews across roles (programs, development, operations, volunteer coordination).

The Performance Review Template should:
- Open with 80-100 words of instructions emphasizing developmental intent, equity, confidentiality, and a 60-minute discussion requirement.
- Follow this order: Employee Info; Role Summary; Review of Last Year’s Goals; Competency Ratings; Strengths & Impact; Development Areas; Next-Period SMART Goals; Support & Resources; Overall Rating; Compensation/Recognition Summary; Signatures & Dates; 90-Day Check-In Plan (for new hires).
- Use a 3-point scale with behavioral anchors: Exceeds Expectations, Meets Expectations, Developing. Tie to nonprofit indicators (e.g., donor stewardship quality, grant/report timeliness, program outcomes, community partnership, fiscal stewardship, DEI practice, collaboration).
- Include mirrored Self-Assessment prompts for each section with space for 100-150 words and evidence fields (data, dates, stakeholder feedback).
- Limit competencies to 3-5 aligned to [VALUES/COMPETENCIES]; provide sample anchors relevant to [MISSION AREA].
- Require review of 3-5 prior goals (status, results, lessons) and creation of 3-5 new SMART goals with measures, deadlines, and low-cost supports (training, mentoring, schedule adjustments).
- Add a Development Plan (2-3 actions, owner, timeline) and Manager Support commitments tailored to small-team capacity.
- Provide a Compensation/Recognition section aligned to [RAISE POLICY] and budget limits; list non-monetary options (title refinement, flexible schedule, PD stipend, conference speaking, public recognition).
- Include signature lines: Employee, Supervisor, [ED/HR], plus acknowledgement of receipt and 90-day follow-up date.
- Length: 500-700 words of template text, with clear fillable fields and prompts.
- Tone options: [FORMAL] policy-aligned and precise; [WARM] supportive and plain-language; [CASUAL] friendly while professional.
- Prepared by [SUPERVISOR TITLE]; co-authored by [EMPLOYEE NAME]; reviewed by [ED/HR].

Quality: Be concrete and evidence-based; avoid vague adjectives, corporate jargon, or punitive language. Prioritize clarity, equity, and documentation that protects the organization while advancing staff growth.

How to Customize

  1. Replace all [BRACKETED] fields with your specific information
  2. Adjust tone and length as needed for your audience
  3. Review and personalize before using

Pro Tips

  1. Test this prompt with your preferred AI tool before using in production
  2. Always review AI output for accuracy and appropriateness
  3. Customize outputs to match your organization’s voice and brand

(See other prompts in the operations category)

Example Outputs

Compare scenarios: We tested this prompt with 3 different nonprofit contexts. Each scenario shows outputs from GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini. Select a model above each scenario to compare.

Small Community Org

Grassroots urban food access nonprofit on Chicago’s South Side; 9 staff and 120 active volunteers; donors include neighborhood giving circles, local grocers, and city microgrants.

View scenario details
[ORGANIZATION]:Southside Fresh Food Collective (Chicago, IL)
[CONSTRUCTIVE/STRUCTURED]:Constructive

Performance Review Template – Southside Fresh Food Collective (Chicago, IL)

Purpose and tone - This review supports growth, recognizes impact, and aligns work with Southside Fresh Food Collective’s mission to expand fresh, affordable food access on Chicago’s South Side. - Use a constructive, strengths-based approach. Be specific, use data and examples, and focus on learning and support.

Review information - Employee name: - Position: - Department/Program (e.g., Markets, Distribution, Urban Agriculture, Outreach, Development, Operations): - Supervisor: - Review period (from/to): - Review type (Annual, Mid-year, Probationary 90-day, Other):

How to use this template - Employee completes Section A (Self-Assessment) and updates Section B (Goals Review) before the meeting. - Supervisor completes Sections C–G and drafts Section H (Goals for next period) in collaboration with the employee. - Both finalize Section I (Development Plan) and Section J (Sign-off).

Section A. Employee self-assessment 1) Biggest wins and contributions this period (program/participant impact, systems improved, partnerships built): - 2) How your work supported our mission and values (community, equity, respect, stewardship, learning): - 3) Progress on last period’s goals (what moved, what stalled, why): - 4) What you learned (skills, tools, insights about community needs): - 5) Challenges and barriers (resources, processes, capacity, coordination): - 6) Support you need from your supervisor or organization: - 7) Feedback for the organization (what to start/stop/continue): -

Section B. Goals review (from the last period) For each goal, complete: - Goal: - Status (Achieved / On track / Partially met / Not met / Deferred): - Outcomes and evidence (metrics, participant stories, deliverables): - What helped or hindered (context, resources, partnerships, seasonality): - Lessons learned and suggested adjustments:

Repeat for up to 5 goals.

Section C. Core competencies assessment Rating scale - 5 Exceptional: Consistently exceeds expectations; a go-to resource and mentor. - 4 Strong: Often exceeds expectations; reliable and independent. - 3 Solid: Meets expectations; dependable performance. - 2 Developing: Inconsistently meets expectations; needs targeted support. - 1 Not yet meeting: Frequently below expectations; requires immediate improvement.

For each competency, provide a rating and brief examples.

1) Mission alignment and community focus (centers participant dignity, advances food access, reflects South Side community priorities) - Rating (1–5): - Examples/evidence:

2) Equity, inclusion, and cultural humility (builds trust across diverse neighborhoods; reduces barriers such as language, transportation, eligibility; applies trauma-informed practices) - Rating: - Examples/evidence:

3) Collaboration and communication (clear, respectful updates; cross-team coordination; timely responses; facilitation) - Rating: - Examples/evidence:

4) Reliability and accountability (punctuality; follow-through; meeting deadlines; accurate documentation) - Rating: - Examples/evidence:

5) Service and participant experience (welcoming environment; problem resolution; privacy/respect; SNAP/WIC support where applicable) - Rating: - Examples/evidence:

6) Safety and compliance (food safety, ServSafe/IDPH standards, PPE, vehicle/warehouse safety, incident reporting) - Rating: - Examples/evidence:

7) Problem solving and initiative (resourcefulness; improves processes; anticipates needs; brings solutions) - Rating: - Examples/evidence:

8) Data and reporting (timely, accurate logs: distributions, waste, attendance, CRM; uses data to inform decisions) - Rating: - Examples/evidence:

9) Stewardship and resource management (care for equipment, budget awareness, reduces waste; sustainable practices) - Rating: - Examples/evidence:

Supervisor overall comments on core competencies: -

Section D. Role-specific competencies (select and assess those that apply)

Program delivery and outreach - Effectively plans and runs community events/markets; engages residents and partners; increases participation and retention. - Rating: - Examples:

Urban agriculture/production - Crop planning; safe harvesting; yield and quality; soil health; season extension; volunteer coordination on-site. - Rating: - Examples:

Warehouse and logistics - Order accuracy; on-time routing; cold chain; inventory rotation; vehicle safety; waste reduction. - Rating: - Examples:

Market operations/retail - Pricing and signage; EBT/SNAP matching; vendor relations; point-of-sale accuracy; customer experience. - Rating: - Examples:

Volunteer management - Recruitment, training, retention; clear roles; recognition; safe and inclusive environment. - Rating: - Examples:

Fundraising and development - Grant deadlines met; quality of proposals/reports; donor stewardship; events; impact storytelling. - Rating: - Examples:

Partnerships and advocacy - Strong relationships with community orgs, farms, clinics, schools; aligns efforts; policy awareness. - Rating: - Examples:

Finance and administration - Budget tracking; purchasing; compliance; record-keeping; audit readiness. - Rating: - Examples:

Communications and storytelling - Clear, mission-aligned content; accurate program info; respectful imagery; bilingual access where relevant. - Rating: - Examples:

Section E. Results and key metrics (select 3–5 relevant) - Metric 1 (e.g., pounds distributed; households served; market sales; volunteer hours; grant deliverables): • Target: • Actual: • Notes/Context: - Metric 2: • Target: • Actual: • Notes/Context: - Metric 3: • Target: • Actual: • Notes/Context: - Participant or partner feedback highlights (quotes or survey data): •

Section F. Strengths and impact - Top strengths observed this period (skills, behaviors, relationships): • - Where this employee’s work made the biggest difference for participants or partners: • - Contributions to team culture and values: •

Section G. Areas for development and support - Priority growth areas (skills, knowledge, behaviors): • - What success would look like next period (specific outcomes or behaviors): • - Recommended supports (training, coaching, shadowing, tools, process changes): •

Section H. Goals for next period (SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound) Set 3–5 goals, including at least one mission/impact goal, one operational/process goal, and one professional development goal.

Goal 1: - Description: - Why it matters (mission/values link): - Measures/targets (include baseline if known): - Key milestones and dates: - Dependencies/support needed: - Due date:

Goal 2: - Description: - Why it matters: - Measures/targets: - Milestones and dates: - Dependencies/support needed: - Due date:

Goal 3 (Professional development): - Description: - Why it matters: - Measures/targets (e.g., certification, applied skill, cross-training): - Milestones and dates: - Resources needed: - Due date:

Optional DEI objective (e.g., increase bilingual access, improve inclusive signage, expand SNAP outreach): - Description: - Measures/targets: - Due date:

Section I. Development plan and resources - Trainings/certifications (examples: ServSafe Food Handler/Manager – Chicago/Illinois; CPR/First Aid; Forklift certification; defensive driving; trauma-informed communication; bilingual customer service; Salesforce/Airtable; grant writing; facilitation) • Priority trainings: • Timeline: - Coaching/mentorship (internal or external): • Focus: • Coach/mentor: • Cadence: - Stretch assignments or cross-training (program swaps, event leadership, data project): • - Tools or process improvements needed: • - Conferences/learning communities (e.g., Illinois Food Access, urban agriculture networks): •

Section J. Summary and sign-off - Employee summary comments (what you’re proud of, what you’ll focus on next period, how we can support you): • - Supervisor summary comments (key messages, commitments, support plan): • - Agreed check-in cadence on goals (e.g., monthly; mid-cycle review date): • - Signatures and dates: • Employee: • Supervisor: • Second-level reviewer (if applicable):

Appendix: Guidance for constructive reviews - Be specific: Pair ratings with 1–2 concrete examples or data points. - Focus on impact: Link work to participant outcomes and mission. - Separate person from problem: Frame gaps as skills to build and systems to improve. - Balance recognition and growth: Aim for 2–3 strengths and 1–2 focused development areas. - Plan support: Every development area should include resources, coaching, or process changes. - Follow through: Revisit goals and supports during regular one-on-ones.

Optional: Mid-cycle 90-day check-in template - Progress on each goal (Green/Yellow/Red) and brief notes: - New information or context: - Adjustments to targets or timelines: - Immediate support/actions before next check-in:

Generated: Nov 1, 20252938 tokens$0.0435 cost
AI Evaluation Details (Score: 9.1/10)
Reasoning:

This is an exceptionally well-crafted performance review template that demonstrates deep understanding of both the specific organization and nonprofit performance management best practices. It balances comprehensiveness with usability, includes highly relevant sector-specific competencies (food safety, SNAP/EBT, urban agriculture), and maintains a genuinely constructive tone throughout. The template is immediately usable with minimal adaptation.

Strengths:
  • Outstanding contextualization: Includes Chicago/Illinois-specific compliance (ServSafe/IDPH, SNAP matching), South Side community focus, and realistic examples (bilingual access, trauma-informed practices, neighborhood partnerships)
  • Comprehensive yet practical structure: Clear instructions for both employee and supervisor, appropriate rating scale with helpful descriptors, and smart inclusion of both core and role-specific competencies covering all likely positions
  • Genuinely constructive approach: The appendix guidance is excellent, emphasizing impact over process, separating person from problem, and requiring support plans for every development area—this prevents punitive use
  • Mission-aligned throughout: Every section connects back to food access impact, participant dignity, and community priorities rather than generic corporate metrics
  • Highly usable additions: The 90-day check-in template, specific training examples relevant to food access work, and DEI objective option show practical foresight
  • Appropriate scope for organization size: The template works for a 9-person staff without being overwhelming, includes volunteer management (critical for 120 volunteers), and balances rigor with grassroots flexibility
Weaknesses:
  • Minor length concern: While comprehensive, the template might feel daunting for a small grassroots org; a one-page 'quick start' guide or simplified version for newer staff could enhance adoption
  • Some jargon without definition: Terms like 'trauma-informed practices' and 'cold chain' are used without brief explanations—not all small nonprofit supervisors may be familiar with these concepts
  • Could strengthen equity lens: While DEI is mentioned, the template could more explicitly prompt supervisors to examine their own biases in ratings or include calibration guidance to ensure equitable assessment across staff

Mid-Size Professional Org

Regional rural legal aid nonprofit serving three Appalachian counties; ~65 staff including attorneys and case managers; donors include state justice grants, bar association campaigns, and community foundations.

View scenario details
[ORGANIZATION]:Mountain Counties Legal Aid Partnership (Appalachia)
[CONSTRUCTIVE/STRUCTURED]:Structured

Mountain Counties Legal Aid Partnership (Appalachia) Performance Review Template

Purpose - Provide structured, fair feedback aligned with our mission to expand access to justice across Appalachia. - Recognize strengths, identify development needs, and set clear goals for the coming period. - Support client-centered, culturally humble, trauma-informed practice and strong community partnerships.

Instructions - Employee completes the Self-Assessment (Section F) before the review meeting. - Supervisor completes Sections B–E and H, drafts Section G with the employee, and finalizes Section I. - Use the rating scale in Section C. Provide specific examples and data where possible. - Mid-year check-in is recommended to review progress on goals and update plans.

Section A. Employee and Review Information - Employee name: - Position/Title: - Team/Unit (e.g., Housing, Family, Consumer, Public Benefits, Intake): - Primary office/Region: - Supervisor: - Review period (from/to): - Review type (Annual, Mid-year, Probationary, Other): - Date of meeting:

Section B. Review of Prior-Period Goals For each goal from the last period, document outcomes and learning.

Goal 1 - Stated goal: - Success measures/targets: - Status (Achieved, Partially achieved, Not achieved): - Evidence/results (e.g., case outcomes, outreach delivered, quality audits, client feedback): - Barriers and how they were addressed: - Lessons learned and carry-forward items:

Goal 2 - Stated goal: - Success measures/targets: - Status: - Evidence/results: - Barriers: - Lessons learned:

Goal 3 (add as needed) - Stated goal: - Success measures/targets: - Status: - Evidence/results: - Barriers: - Lessons learned:

Section C. Competencies Assessment Rating scale 1 Needs improvement: Frequently below expectations; immediate support and a plan required. 2 Developing: Inconsistently meets expectations; improving with guidance. 3 Effective: Consistently meets role expectations. 4 Strong: Often exceeds expectations; model for peers. 5 Exceptional: Far exceeds expectations; innovates and elevates team/organization.

Core competencies (all roles) 1. Client-Centered Advocacy and Cultural Humility - Provides trauma-informed services; respects Appalachian cultural contexts and community norms. - Integrates client goals into case strategy; ensures language access and disability accommodations. - Rating (1–5): - Evidence/examples:

2. Legal/Program Knowledge and Judgment - Applies relevant law and policy; exercises sound judgment; seeks supervision appropriately. - For non-attorney roles: Applies program procedures accurately; knows when to escalate issues. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

3. Case and Time Management - Manages caseload, deadlines, and travel demands; keeps files complete and current. - Uses case management system accurately (timekeeping, CSR, conflicts, outcomes). - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

4. Communication - Clear written and oral communication with clients, courts, partners, and team. - Plain-language explanations; respectful, timely responses. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

5. Community Engagement and Partnerships - Builds and sustains relationships with local partners (courts, shelters, clinics, agencies). - Plans and participates in outreach/clinics; adapts to rural access barriers. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

6. Equity, Inclusion, and Language Access - Advances equitable access; identifies and addresses barriers for marginalized communities. - Uses interpreters appropriately; contributes to inclusive team culture. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

7. Collaboration and Teamwork - Supports colleagues; shares knowledge; contributes to cross-office coordination. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

8. Compliance, Ethics, and Data Stewardship - Adheres to ethics, confidentiality, and funder requirements (e.g., conflicts, eligibility, reporting). - Protects data privacy and follows security practices. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

9. Technology Fluency - Effectively uses case management system, remote meeting tools, document assembly/e-signature. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

10. Professional Development and Wellbeing - Pursues learning (CLEs/trainings); uses feedback; maintains sustainable practices to mitigate vicarious trauma. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

Role-specific competencies (complete those that apply) A. Litigation and Advocacy (Attorneys/Advocates) - Legal research, motion practice, negotiation, trial/administrative hearing advocacy; ethical lawyering. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

B. Intake/Navigation - Triage accuracy; customer service; priority-setting; warm handoffs; referral quality. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

C. Paralegal/Legal Assistant - Drafting, file management, discovery support, client communication, court filing accuracy. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

D. Supervisory/Leadership (if applicable) - Sets expectations, coaches, and develops staff; equitable workload; timely feedback; manages risk and compliance. - Rating: - Evidence/examples:

Section D. Strengths and Notable Accomplishments - Top strengths observed this period: - Impactful results (e.g., key case wins, systemic outcomes, successful clinics, process improvements): - Contributions to team culture, DEI, or community relationships: - Client or partner feedback highlights:

Section E. Areas for Development - Skills/competencies to strengthen: - Behaviors to adjust or adopt: - Cases/situations that illustrate development needs: - Support/resources that would help (training, mentoring, shadowing, tools, policy clarifications):

Section F. Employee Self-Assessment - What achievements are you most proud of this period? - Which goals did you meet or exceed? What enabled your success? - Where did you encounter challenges? What would you do differently? - How did you advance client-centered practice and equity? - How did you build or maintain community partnerships? - What feedback from clients, courts, or partners stands out? - Professional development completed (CLEs, trainings, certifications) and key takeaways: - What supports or resources would help you be more effective next period?

Section G. Goals for Next Review Period (SMART) Set 3–6 goals aligned with program priorities. For each goal:

Goal [#] - Objective (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound): - Success measures/targets (quantitative and qualitative): - Key actions/steps and milestones: - Dependencies/risks and mitigation: - Resources/support needed (training, technology, mentorship, travel budget, language access): - Owner(s): - Timeline/checkpoints (monthly or quarterly):

Suggested goal categories (choose those that fit) - Client Services and Quality (e.g., expand housing defense capacity in X county; improve time-to-service) - Community Engagement and Partnerships (e.g., quarterly courthouse clinics; new referral pathways) - Equity and Language Access (e.g., implement plain-language forms; interpreter workflow) - Operational Excellence and Compliance (e.g., 100% timely timekeeping; data accuracy audits) - Professional Growth (e.g., trial skills, benefits specialization, supervision skills) - Innovation/Process Improvement (e.g., template library; remote intake workflow for limited broadband)

Section H. Development Plan and Support - Priority skills/competencies to develop: - Learning activities (CLEs, trainings, certifications, shadowing, communities of practice): - Stretch assignments or leadership opportunities: - Mentors/coaches and meeting cadence: - Wellbeing plan (e.g., debrief practices, coverage for high-intensity work, EAP use): - Target dates and checkpoints:

Section I. Overall Summary Supervisor summary - Overall evaluation (brief narrative aligned to ratings and goals): - Key strengths to leverage next period: - Most important development focus: - Readiness for increased responsibility or new case types (if applicable):

Employee comments (optional) - Employee response to the review and summary:

Section J. Signatures and Follow-Up - Employee signature/date: - Supervisor signature/date: - Next check-in date(s): - Documents attached (if any): goal worksheet, training plan, audit results.

Appendix: Behavioral Anchors (quick reference) - 1 Needs improvement: Misses deadlines; incomplete documentation; inconsistent client follow-up; requires frequent correction; risks compliance. - 2 Developing: Understands expectations; performance varies; needs guidance to prioritize; documentation improving. - 3 Effective: Meets deadlines; maintains accurate files; communicates clearly; handles typical complexity independently; follows policies. - 4 Strong: Anticipates issues; improves processes; mentors peers; strengthens community partnerships; elevates quality. - 5 Exceptional: Delivers outstanding results; innovates sustainably; is a go-to resource; advances organizational strategy and equity.

Note on evidence Where possible, reference specific examples and data such as: - Caseload and disposition mix; time-to-initial-contact; hearing outcomes; benefits secured; evictions prevented. - Outreach/clinic counts and reach; partner referrals; client satisfaction feedback. - Compliance metrics (timekeeping timeliness, conflict checks, CSR/outcome coding accuracy). - Training hours completed and applied practice changes.

This template is intended to be adapted to local unit priorities and funder requirements while maintaining a client-centered, community-rooted approach.

Generated: Nov 1, 20253035 tokens$0.0449 cost
AI Evaluation Details (Score: 9.2/10)
Reasoning:

This is an exceptionally well-crafted performance review template that demonstrates deep understanding of both legal aid operations and rural Appalachian context. It balances comprehensive structure with practical usability, incorporating mission-specific competencies like trauma-informed practice and cultural humility that are authentic to the sector. The template is immediately deployable with minimal adaptation.

Strengths:
  • Outstanding contextual specificity: References to Appalachian cultural contexts, rural access barriers, limited broadband, courthouse clinics, and regional office structures show genuine understanding of this organization's operating environment
  • Comprehensive competency framework tailored to legal aid: Includes both universal nonprofit competencies and role-specific ones (litigation, intake, paralegal, supervisory) with appropriate legal aid terminology (CSR, conflicts, eligibility, LSC compliance implications)
  • Exceptional attention to equity and trauma-informed practice: Weaves DEI, language access, cultural humility, and vicarious trauma mitigation throughout rather than treating them as add-ons
  • Highly practical design: Clear instructions, behavioral anchors, evidence suggestions with specific metrics (time-to-initial-contact, evictions prevented), SMART goal framework, and mid-year check-in recommendation
  • Mission-aligned throughout: Every section connects back to access to justice, client-centered advocacy, and community partnerships rather than generic corporate performance language
  • Excellent use of legal aid-specific systems and terminology: Case management systems, timekeeping, CSR coding, conflicts checks, CLE requirements, LSC/funder compliance demonstrate sector expertise
Weaknesses:
  • Length may be intimidating for smaller teams or first-time users: While comprehensive, the template is quite extensive and might benefit from a 'quick start' or simplified version for organizations with limited HR capacity
  • Some competencies could overlap in practice: The distinction between competencies 5 (Community Engagement) and 7 (Collaboration) might blur for some roles, potentially causing rating confusion
  • Minor authenticity concern: While excellent overall, a few phrases like 'data stewardship' and 'innovates sustainably' have slight corporate/AI flavor that could be simplified to plainer language more typical of rural legal aid culture

Large Established Org

International WASH and maternal–child health NGO headquartered in New York City with programs across East Africa and South Asia; ~450 staff; donors include USAID/FCDO, major foundations, corporate partners, and high-net-worth donors.

View scenario details
[ORGANIZATION]:AquaVida International (Global WASH & MCH)
[CONSTRUCTIVE/STRUCTURED]:Constructive

Performance Review Template – AquaVida International (Global WASH & MCH)

Purpose Support a constructive, forward-looking conversation focused on impact, learning, and growth in AquaVida’s mission to improve WASH and Maternal, Newborn and Child Health outcomes.

Instructions - Timeframe: Review covers [start date] to [end date]. - Who completes: Employee completes the self-assessment; manager completes the assessment; both discuss and agree on goals for the next period. - Evidence-based: Reference results, data, stakeholder feedback, and examples. - Tone: Describe behaviors and outcomes; identify enablers, barriers, and support needed.

Rating Scale (use where ratings are requested; N/A if not applicable) 5 Exceptional – Consistently exceeds expectations; advances best practice and mentors others. 4 Strong – Often exceeds expectations; dependable high-quality results. 3 Meets – Consistently meets expectations; solid and reliable performance. 2 Inconsistent – Partially meets expectations; needs improvement and support. 1 Not yet meeting – Does not meet expectations; requires significant improvement.

Header - Employee name: - Role/Title: - Department/Program (e.g., WASH in HCFs, SBC, MCH quality of care, MEL, Operations): - Location (HQ/Regional/Country; remote/office/field-based): - Supervisor: - Review period: - Date of review conversation:

A. Review of Prior Period Goals For each goal, summarize outcomes and learning.

1) Goal: - Target and indicators (e.g., coverage, JMP service levels, ANC/PNC quality metrics, grant deliverables, budget burn rate, DQA results): - Status (achieved/partially/not achieved): - Evidence of results: - Enablers and barriers: - Lessons learned and adaptations: - Employee self-rating (optional 1–5): - Manager rating (optional 1–5):

2) Goal: - Target and indicators: - Status: - Evidence of results: - Enablers and barriers: - Lessons learned and adaptations: - Employee self-rating: - Manager rating:

3) Goal: - Target and indicators: - Status: - Evidence of results: - Enablers and barriers: - Lessons learned and adaptations: - Employee self-rating: - Manager rating:

B. Core Competencies Assessment Rate and comment on observable behaviors and impact.

1) Mission and beneficiary focus (centers people we serve; equity-driven): - Rating (1–5): - Evidence/comments:

2) Collaboration and cross-cultural communication (works effectively across countries, partners, and disciplines): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

3) Safeguarding, protection, and ethics (creates safe environments; follows PSEAH policies; mandatory reporting): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

4) Diversity, equity, and inclusion (integrates gender and social inclusion; respectful, bias-aware practice): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

5) Results and quality improvement (plans, executes, and iterates to improve outcomes; uses data for decisions): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

6) Accountability and compliance (donor, financial, procurement, security, data protection): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

7) Learning, adaptation, and resilience (reflects, tests, and scales improvements; manages uncertainty): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

8) Communication and stakeholder management (clear, timely, audience-appropriate; government and partner engagement): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

C. Functional/Technical Competencies (select those relevant to the role) 1) Program design and implementation (theory of change, SBC, CLTS, WASH in HCFs, QoC for MNCH): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

2) Technical expertise (e.g., WASH engineering, IPC/WASH in HCFs, MNCH clinical or public health, nutrition integration): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

3) MEL and data quality (indicator design, DQA, routine HMIS/DHIS2 use, qualitative methods, learning agendas): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

4) Partnership and government relations (coordination, policy alignment, capacity strengthening, localization): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

5) Grant and financial management (workplans, budgets, burn rate, donor reporting—USAID/UNICEF/FCDO, cost-efficiency): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

6) Supply chain and operations (WASH commodities, essential MNCH supplies, last-mile logistics, facility readiness): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

7) Risk, safety, and security (context analysis, duty of care, incident response, business continuity): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

8) Environmental sustainability and climate resilience (climate-smart WASH, environmental compliance, water resource protection): - Rating: - Evidence/comments:

D. Strengths and Impact Identify 3–5 strengths with concrete examples of behavior and results.

- Strength 1 and evidence: - Strength 2 and evidence: - Strength 3 and evidence: - Additional strengths (optional):

E. Areas for Development and Support Needed Select 2–3 priority areas. Be specific and constructive.

- Development area 1: - Why it matters (impact on outcomes/teams/partners): - Success looks like: - Support needed (training, mentoring, shadowing, tools, time, budget): - Timeline and check-in cadence:

- Development area 2: - Why it matters: - Success looks like: - Support needed: - Timeline and check-in cadence:

- Development area 3 (optional): - Why it matters: - Success looks like: - Support needed: - Timeline and check-in cadence:

F. Employee Self-Assessment Employee completes before the conversation.

- Key achievements I’m most proud of (impact, equity, quality): - How I lived AquaVida’s values: - Biggest challenges and root causes: - What I tried and learned (including any pivots): - Feedback for my manager and organization (what would help me be more effective): - Well-being and workload (work-life balance, travel, safety): - Career interests and growth aspirations (technical, managerial, country/region focus): - Training or experiences I’d like in the next period (courses, communities of practice, stretch assignments): - Any safeguarding, ethics, or safety concerns to note (handled per policy; do not include confidential details here—use formal reporting channels as required):

G. Goals for Next Period Set 3–5 SMART goals tied to strategy, funder commitments, and beneficiary outcomes. Include indicators, milestones, and resources.

1) Goal: - Strategic link (program, grant, strategy pillar): - SMART target and indicators (e.g., % facilities with basic WASH per JMP, stockout rate <5%, ANC QoC score ≥80%): - Milestones and due dates: - Owner and collaborators (internal and partners/government): - Resources and support required: - Risks and mitigations (context, security, supply chain, partner capacity): - How we will measure learning and equity impacts:

2) Goal: - Strategic link: - SMART target and indicators: - Milestones and due dates: - Owner and collaborators: - Resources and support required: - Risks and mitigations: - Learning and equity:

3) Goal: - Strategic link: - SMART target and indicators: - Milestones and due dates: - Owner and collaborators: - Resources and support required: - Risks and mitigations: - Learning and equity:

Development and Well-being Goals (at least one) - Professional development goal (skills, certification, mentorship): - Activities and timeline: - Success measures: - Well-being goal (workload, travel, resilience): - Activities and timeline: - Success measures: - DEI and safeguarding goal (practice or leadership contribution): - Activities and timeline: - Success measures:

H. Optional Overall Summary - Overall performance summary (narrative, balanced, evidence-based): - Optional overall rating (1–5): - Recognition (awards, commendations, publications, conference presentations): - Mobility considerations (future assignments/rotations, international travel readiness):

I. Check-ins, Follow-up, and Signatures - Quarterly check-in dates and focus: - Immediate next steps (manager and employee): - Employee signature/date: - Manager signature/date: - People & Culture signature/date (if applicable):

Guidance for Constructive Feedback - Be specific: describe the situation, behavior, and impact. - Focus on outcomes and growth: what enabled success; what would make it easier next time. - Co-create support: clarify resources, decisions, and timelines needed. - Keep people safe: escalate safeguarding, ethics, and security concerns through formal channels promptly.

Notes - Use N/A where items don’t apply to the role. - Attach supporting documents (dashboards, DQA reports, budget vs. actuals, partner feedback, beneficiary stories) as appendices.

Generated: Nov 1, 20253104 tokens$0.0459 cost
AI Evaluation Details (Score: 9.1/10)
Reasoning:

This is an exceptionally well-crafted performance review template that demonstrates deep understanding of both the WASH/MCH sector and large international NGO operations. The constructive tone is consistently maintained throughout, with emphasis on learning, growth, and impact rather than punitive assessment. The template is comprehensive, sector-specific, and immediately usable.

Strengths:
  • Highly sector-specific content with authentic WASH/MCH terminology (JMP service levels, CLTS, WASH in HCFs, ANC/PNC quality metrics, PSEAH, DHIS2) that demonstrates genuine understanding of AquaVida's technical domain
  • Excellent balance of program impact focus with essential compliance areas (safeguarding, donor accountability, DEI) reflecting real priorities of large international NGOs
  • Constructive tone expertly executed through language choices like 'enablers and barriers,' 'learning and adaptations,' 'support needed,' and 'co-create support' rather than deficit-focused language
  • Comprehensive competency framework covering both universal NGO competencies (safeguarding, cross-cultural collaboration) and technical/functional skills specific to WASH and MCH programming
  • Practical design features including N/A options, evidence-based approach, quarterly check-ins, and guidance on constructive feedback that make it genuinely usable
  • Strong emphasis on equity, learning, and beneficiary outcomes woven throughout, reflecting contemporary best practices in international development
  • Thoughtful inclusion of well-being, workload, and safety considerations appropriate for field-based international staff
  • Development goals section includes professional growth, well-being, and DEI/safeguarding dimensions, showing holistic approach to staff development
Weaknesses:
  • Template is quite lengthy and comprehensive, which while thorough, may be overwhelming for some users or contexts—could benefit from a 'quick start' or simplified version option
  • The optional overall rating in Section H could create tension with the constructive, growth-focused approach if managers feel pressured to use numerical ratings when narrative feedback might be more appropriate

Test Summary: Generated Nov 1, 20253 scenarios • 9 total outputs • Average quality score: 8.82/10 • Total validation cost: $0.2412